Republic of the Congo

Retail_Trading_Status

Gray-Zone High Confidence

Analysis ID: #764
Version: Latest
Created: 2025-12-12 05:09
Run: 26b7fe60...
History: View all versions
Workflow Stage: Step 1

Executive Summary

Retail cryptocurrency trading in the Republic of the Congo (Congo-Brazzaville) falls into a regulatory Gray-Zone due to conflicting regional directives within the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC). While the regional market regulator (COSUMAF) introduced a licensing framework for digital asset service providers in 2022, the regional central bank (BEAC) maintains a strict prohibition on banks and microfinance institutions facilitating crypto transactions. Consequently, while individual possession is not explicitly criminalized, no licensed local exchanges exist, and the banking sector is effectively barred from the industry.

Detailed Explanation

The regulatory environment for cryptocurrency in the Republic of the Congo is classified as a Gray-Zone, characterized by a fundamental conflict between regional directives that makes regulated retail trading technically possible but operationally impossible. This status stems from contradictory positions within the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC). On one hand, the regional market regulator, COSUMAF, established a licensing framework for Digital Asset Service Providers (PSAN) with its Regulation No. 01/22/CEMAC/UMAC/COSUMAF/CM enacted on July 21, 2022, which theoretically legalizes regulated crypto services. On the other hand, the regional central bank, the Bank of Central African States (BEAC), maintains a strict prohibition. Through a directive referenced as B1/00/22/483 dated May 6, 2022, BEAC prohibits all banks and microfinance institutions from holding, exchanging, or facilitating transactions involving crypto assets, a stance supported by the Central African Monetary Union (UMAC) to protect the CFA Franc. Consequently, while individual possession is not criminalized, the banking sector is completely barred from the industry, and no entities in the Republic of the Congo are known to hold a valid VASP license from COSUMAF, forcing users to rely on peer-to-peer methods or foreign payment processors. The country generally aligns with BEAC's conservative stance, unlike the Central African Republic, and has not passed national legislation to challenge this blockade. The regulator, COSUMAF, frequently warns the public about unlicensed investment schemes posing as crypto platforms, highlighting the high scam risk in this unserved market.

Summary Points

I. Regulatory Status
* Gray-Zone: Retail cryptocurrency trading exists in a regulatory gray area due to conflicting regional directives.
* Individual possession of crypto assets is not explicitly criminalized.
* No licensed local Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) are currently known to operate.

II. Key Regulatory Bodies
* COSUMAF (Commission de Surveillance du Marché Financier de l'Afrique Centrale): The regional market regulator responsible for licensing Digital Asset Service Providers (PSAN) under its 2022 framework.
* BEAC (Bank of Central African States): The regional central bank that prohibits financial institutions from any involvement with crypto assets.
* UMAC (Central African Monetary Union): Oversees monetary policy and supports BEAC's restrictive stance to protect the stability of the CFA Franc.

III. Important Legislation
* COSUMAF Regulation No. 01/22/CEMAC/UMAC/COSUMAF/CM (Enacted: 2022-07-21)
* Establishes the organization of the Central African financial market.
* Articles 145 and 160 define 'Digital Asset Service Providers' and set out a licensing regime, theoretically legalizing regulated crypto services.
* BEAC Letter on Crypto Assets (Ref: B1/00/22/483) (Enacted: 2022-05-06)
* A directive from the BEAC Governor prohibiting all banks and microfinance institutions from holding, exchanging, or facilitating transactions related to crypto assets.
* Instruction No. 002/2020/CEMAC/UMAC/CM (Enacted: 2020-10-01)
* An earlier regional instruction reinforcing exchange controls, often cited to justify blocking crypto-related capital outflows.

IV. Compliance Requirements
* For a business to operate legally, it would require a VASP (PSAN) license from the regional regulator COSUMAF under Regulation No. 01/22.
* No entities in the Republic of the Congo are currently known to hold such a license.

V. Notable Restrictions or Limitations
* Banking Prohibition: A core operational blockade exists. BEAC's directive forbids local banks from processing transfers to or from crypto exchanges, holding crypto, or facilitating related payments.
* This forces users and potential businesses to rely on peer-to-peer (P2P) methods or foreign payment processors.
* The country has not passed any national law to circumvent the regional banking prohibition, unlike the Central African Republic.

VI. Recent Developments or Notes
* The 'Allowed-Regulated' status is technically possible under COSUMAF's 2022 rules but is operationally impossible due to the BEAC banking prohibition.
* COSUMAF frequently issues public warnings about unlicensed investment schemes masquerading as crypto platforms, indicating a high scam risk.
* It is crucial to distinguish the Republic of the Congo (Congo-Brazzaville) from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as they have different central banks and regulatory trajectories.

Full Analysis Report

The regulatory status of cryptocurrency in the Republic of the Congo is defined by a complex tug-of-war between two regional bodies governing the CEMAC zone. On one side, the Central African Financial Market Supervisory Commission (COSUMAF) moved to regulate the sector by passing Regulation No. 01/22 in July 2022. This text formally recognizes 'Digital Assets' and created a category for 'Digital Asset Service Providers' (PSAN), outlining requirements for licensing, capital adequacy, and consumer protection. Under this framework, crypto business is theoretically 'Allowed-Regulated'.

However, this regulatory path is effectively blocked by the Bank of Central African States (BEAC), the central bank for the region. In May 2022, responding to the Central African Republic's unilateral adoption of Bitcoin, BEAC issued a stern directive prohibiting all credit institutions, microfinance entities, and payment providers in the zone from dealing in or facilitating cryptocurrency transactions. This 'Bank Ban' remains the dominant operational reality in Congo-Brazzaville. As of early 2024, BEAC reiterated its opposition, stating that crypto assets are not part of the central bank's model and pose risks to the monetary union's reserves.

For the retail user in Congo-Brazzaville, this results in a Gray-Zone environment. Possession and trading are not explicitly criminalized by a national penal code, and the market regulator has a theoretical framework for it. Yet, the practical means to trade—specifically banking rails—are severed. Users cannot use local bank cards or transfers to fund accounts on global exchanges without risking account closure or transaction rejection. Activity is largely driven underground or towards Peer-to-Peer (P2P) markets that bypass the formal banking sector.

Furthermore, there is no evidence that COSUMAF has successfully issued licenses to any operators in Congo-Brazzaville, likely because such operators could not obtain the necessary bank accounts to function. The government of the Republic of the Congo, unlike its neighbor the CAR, has not sought to override BEAC's authority with national legislation, preferring to maintain alignment with the monetary union's conservative approach. Consequently, while not 'Banned' in the sense of being a crime for individuals, the sector operates in a legal limbo where one regulator says 'get a license' and the other says 'do not touch'.

The regulatory status of cryptocurrency in the Republic of the Congo is defined by a complex tug-of-war between two regional bodies governing the CEMAC zone. On one side, the Central African Financial Market Supervisory Commission (COSUMAF) moved to regulate the sector by passing Regulation No. 01/22 in July 2022. This text formally recognizes 'Digital Assets' and created a category for 'Digital Asset Service Providers' (PSAN), outlining requirements for licensing, capital adequacy, and consumer protection. Under this framework, crypto business is theoretically 'Allowed-Regulated'.

However, this regulatory path is effectively blocked by the Bank of Central African States (BEAC), the central bank for the region. In May 2022, responding to the Central African Republic's unilateral adoption of Bitcoin, BEAC issued a stern directive prohibiting all credit institutions, microfinance entities, and payment providers in the zone from dealing in or facilitating cryptocurrency transactions. This 'Bank Ban' remains the dominant operational reality in Congo-Brazzaville. As of early 2024, BEAC reiterated its opposition, stating that crypto assets are not part of the central bank's model and pose risks to the monetary union's reserves.

For the retail user in Congo-Brazzaville, this results in a Gray-Zone environment. Possession and trading are not explicitly criminalized by a national penal code, and the market regulator has a theoretical framework for it. Yet, the practical means to trade—specifically banking rails—are severed. Users cannot use local bank cards or transfers to fund accounts on global exchanges without risking account closure or transaction rejection. Activity is largely driven underground or towards Peer-to-Peer (P2P) markets that bypass the formal banking sector.

Furthermore, there is no evidence that COSUMAF has successfully issued licenses to any operators in Congo-Brazzaville, likely because such operators could not obtain the necessary bank accounts to function. The government of the Republic of the Congo, unlike its neighbor the CAR, has not sought to override BEAC's authority with national legislation, preferring to maintain alignment with the monetary union's conservative approach. Consequently, while not 'Banned' in the sense of being a crime for individuals, the sector operates in a legal limbo where one regulator says 'get a license' and the other says 'do not touch'.

Source Evidence

Primary and secondary sources cited in this analysis

COSUMAF Regulation No. 01/22/CEMAC/UMAC/COSUMAF/CM primary (regulator)

2022-07-21

"Article 145: Les intermédiaires de marché comprennent... les Prestataires de Services sur Actifs Numériques (PSAN)."

BEAC Press Release on Crypto Assets in CEMAC primary (official_government)

2022-05-06

"The BEAC prohibits credit institutions and other payment processors from holding, exchanging, or settling transactions in cryptocurrencies."

COSUMAF Alert on Unregulated Activities primary (regulator)

2023-11-09

"La COSUMAF alerte le public que l'exercice des activités de crypto-actifs dans l'espace CEMAC ne fait pas l'objet d'encadrement règlementaire [Warning issued prior to full implementation of 2022 rules]."

IMF Country Report No. 23/178 - Central African Republic secondary (analysis)

2023-05-02

"The regional banking regulator COBAC issued a regulation prohibiting its supervised institutions from engaging in transactions with crypto assets... citing risks to financial stability (Decision D-2022/071 from May 6, 2022)."

Business in Cameroon: BEAC Rejects Crypto Regulation secondary (news)

2024-02-05

"BEAC maintains its opposition to cryptocurrency regulation, even as COSUMAF excluded cryptocurrencies from its regulatory framework on August 1, 2022."