Holy See

Retail_Trading_Status

Allowed-Unregulated High Confidence

Analysis ID: #683
Version: Latest
Created: 2025-12-12 04:22
Run: 6457490a...
History: View all versions
Workflow Stage: Step 1

Executive Summary

Retail cryptocurrency trading is legally permitted in the Holy See (Vatican City State) due to the absence of prohibiting legislation, though it remains specifically unregulated. There is no dedicated licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), and the sole financial institution, the Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR), does not offer crypto services. The Financial Supervisory and Information Authority (ASIF) oversees financial integrity but has not issued specific regulations governing retail crypto trading.

Detailed Explanation

Retail cryptocurrency trading is legally permitted and specifically unregulated in the Holy See (Vatican City State). The activity is allowed due to the absence of any prohibiting legislation, but there is no dedicated regulatory framework, licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), or specific consumer protections governing it. The foundational financial law is Law No. XVIII on Transparency, Supervision and Financial Intelligence, enacted on 2013-10-08, which established the Financial Supervisory and Information Authority (ASIF) as the primary anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) regulator and financial intelligence unit. While this law provides a general framework for financial supervision, it does not explicitly mention cryptocurrencies, leaving retail trading in a state of regulatory ambiguity. The sole authorized financial institution, the Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR), maintains a conservative risk profile and does not offer cryptocurrency services, forcing any residents engaging in crypto activity to rely on foreign intermediaries for access and custody. The legislative body, the Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State, has not enacted any laws specifically addressing digital assets, contrasting with its demonstrated capacity to regulate emerging technology as seen with the Decree on Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence (Decree No. DCCII) enacted on 2025-01-01. Important considerations include the jurisdiction's status as a tax haven, where the lack of personal income or capital gains tax makes cryptocurrency gains effectively tax-free for residents. However, the Vatican is subject to monitoring by Moneyval, and the absence of a VASP regulatory regime represents a noted gap in its efforts toward full FATF compliance. The future regulatory stance may be influenced by the Vatican's Monetary Agreement with the European Union, though it remains unclear if EU regulations like MiCA will be formally adopted.

Summary Points

I. Regulatory Status
* Retail cryptocurrency trading is Allowed-Unregulated.
* Activity is legally permitted due to the absence of prohibiting legislation.
* There is no dedicated licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs).
* The market is characterized by regulatory ambiguity and a lack of specific consumer protection rules.

II. Key Regulatory Bodies
* Financial Supervisory and Information Authority (ASIF): The primary AML/CFT regulator and financial intelligence unit. Oversees financial integrity but has not issued specific crypto regulations.
* Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR): The sole authorized financial institution (commercial bank equivalent). It does not offer cryptocurrency services.
* Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State: The legislative body responsible for enacting financial laws.

III. Important Legislation
* Law No. XVIII on Transparency, Supervision and Financial Intelligence (2013-10-08): Foundational AML/CFT law establishing ASIF. Provides the general framework for financial supervision but does not explicitly regulate crypto.
* Decree on Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence, Decree No. DCCII (2025-01-01): Highlights the state's capacity to regulate emerging technology, contrasting with the absence of crypto-specific rules.

IV. Compliance Requirements
* No specific crypto licensing or operational requirements exist.
* The general AML/CFT framework under Law No. XVIII may apply, but its application to crypto entities is undefined.

V. Notable Restrictions or Limitations
* Banking Restrictions: The IOR, the only local bank, maintains a conservative risk profile and does not facilitate crypto transactions, forcing reliance on foreign intermediaries.
* Contract Enforcement Risks: The lack of specific legal recognition for crypto creates risks for contract enforcement.
* Regulatory Gap: The absence of a VASP regime is noted as a gap in the jurisdiction's FATF compliance under Moneyval oversight.

VI. Recent Developments or Notes
* Tax Haven Status: No personal income tax or capital gains tax for residents, making crypto gains effectively tax-free.
* EU Monetary Agreement: The Vatican's agreement with the EU may influence future regulation, but it is unclear if EU regulations like MiCA will be adopted.
* The regulatory stance remains unique, with the potential for change driven by external compliance pressures rather than a domestic market.

Full Analysis Report

The regulatory status of cryptocurrency in the Holy See (Vatican City State) is best classified as 'Allowed-UnRegulated'. There are no specific laws that explicitly permit or prohibit the holding, trading, or mining of digital assets. Consequently, residents—comprising mostly clergy, Swiss Guards, and lay employees—are legally free to own and trade cryptocurrencies. However, this freedom exists in a vacuum of specific regulatory oversight, as the state has not established a licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) nor issued consumer protection guidelines specific to the sector.

The primary financial regulator, the Supervisory and Financial Information Authority (ASIF), enforces strict Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) standards rooted in Law No. XVIII (2013). While ASIF has broad powers to supervise financial activities, it has not extended its prudential supervision to include crypto-specific entities, largely because no such entities operate within the Vatican's jurisdiction. The state's small size and unique functional citizenship model mean there is no domestic retail market to regulate, rendering a local VASP regime practically unnecessary for the time being.

Operationally, the environment is restrictive despite the legal allowance. The Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR), commonly known as the Vatican Bank, is the sole financial institution authorized to operate. The IOR has historically taken a conservative approach to financial risk and does not offer cryptocurrency services or accounts. Furthermore, the IOR has publicly distanced itself from crypto-related schemes, issuing denials regarding fraudulent tokens using its name. Residents wishing to trade must therefore rely on foreign exchanges and non-Vatican banking rails, provided they can satisfy the Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements of those external jurisdictions.

From a taxation perspective, the Holy See is highly favorable. The jurisdiction does not levy personal income tax or capital gains tax on its citizens. This implies that any profits derived from cryptocurrency trading are tax-exempt. However, this benefit is limited to the approximately 800 citizens and residents, and the lack of a double-taxation treaty covering crypto assets with Italy could complicate matters for those with dual residency or financial ties across the border.

The regulatory status of cryptocurrency in the Holy See (Vatican City State) is best classified as 'Allowed-UnRegulated'. There are no specific laws that explicitly permit or prohibit the holding, trading, or mining of digital assets. Consequently, residents—comprising mostly clergy, Swiss Guards, and lay employees—are legally free to own and trade cryptocurrencies. However, this freedom exists in a vacuum of specific regulatory oversight, as the state has not established a licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) nor issued consumer protection guidelines specific to the sector.

The primary financial regulator, the Supervisory and Financial Information Authority (ASIF), enforces strict Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) standards rooted in Law No. XVIII (2013). While ASIF has broad powers to supervise financial activities, it has not extended its prudential supervision to include crypto-specific entities, largely because no such entities operate within the Vatican's jurisdiction. The state's small size and unique functional citizenship model mean there is no domestic retail market to regulate, rendering a local VASP regime practically unnecessary for the time being.

Operationally, the environment is restrictive despite the legal allowance. The Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR), commonly known as the Vatican Bank, is the sole financial institution authorized to operate. The IOR has historically taken a conservative approach to financial risk and does not offer cryptocurrency services or accounts. Furthermore, the IOR has publicly distanced itself from crypto-related schemes, issuing denials regarding fraudulent tokens using its name. Residents wishing to trade must therefore rely on foreign exchanges and non-Vatican banking rails, provided they can satisfy the Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements of those external jurisdictions.

From a taxation perspective, the Holy See is highly favorable. The jurisdiction does not levy personal income tax or capital gains tax on its citizens. This implies that any profits derived from cryptocurrency trading are tax-exempt. However, this benefit is limited to the approximately 800 citizens and residents, and the lack of a double-taxation treaty covering crypto assets with Italy could complicate matters for those with dual residency or financial ties across the border.

Source Evidence

Primary and secondary sources cited in this analysis

ASIF Annual Report 2023 primary (regulator)

2024-05-21

"ASIF carries out... supervision aimed at the prevention and countering of money laundering... with regard to the entities and subjects under its supervision [exclusively the IOR]."

Moneyval Follow-up Report on Holy See primary (international_organization)

2024-05-21

"The Holy See (including Vatican City State) has made progress to address the technical compliance deficiencies... [but] Recommendation 15 (New Technologies) [was not among those re-rated to Compliant]."

Law No. XVIII on Transparency, Supervision and Financial Intelligence primary (law_text)

2013-10-08

"The purpose of this Law is to prevent and counter money laundering and the financing of terrorism... applies to... all Dicasteries of the Roman Curia."

Crypto Adoption Around the World: Vatican City secondary (analysis)

2024-12-08

"Cryptocurrency is unregulated in Vatican City; however, people can own and trade crypto assets. There are currently no crypto tax laws in Vatican City."

Is Crypto Legal In Vatican City? secondary (analysis)

2025-01-01

"As of 2025, cryptocurrency remains in a legally ambiguous position in Vatican City. There are no specific laws or regulations that explicitly permit or prohibit the use of cryptocurrencies."