Back to Analyses

Uganda

Retail_Trading_Status

Gray-Zone Unknown
Edit
Analysis ID
#244
Version
Archived
Created
2025-04-13 08:02
Workflow Stage
Live

Executive Summary

The status of retail cryptocurrency trading in Uganda is best described as a 'Gray-Zone,' as it is not explicitly banned but faces significant regulatory restrictions and warnings. The primary regulator, the Bank of Uganda (BoU), has prohibited licensed institutions from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions. Key legislation includes the National Payment Systems Act, 2020, and amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering Act. While there is no formal legal tender status, the government is considering future regulations and explorations via the regulatory sandbox, and citizens use P2P workarounds.

Key Pillars

  • Primary regulator: Bank of Uganda (BoU), which directs licensees under the National Payment Systems Act to desist from liquidating cryptocurrency.
  • Core Compliance Requirements: AML/CFT obligations for VASPs, including registration with the FIA, customer due diligence (KYC), and reporting suspicious transactions.
  • Licensing: No organization has been licensed to operate as a cryptocurrency exchange.

Landmark Laws

  • National Payment Systems (NPS) Act, 2020: Used by the BoU to issue directives prohibiting licensed institutions from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions.
  • BoU Circular (NPSD 306/10), April 29, 2022: Prohibits institutions licensed under the NPS Act from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions.
  • Amendment to the Anti-Money Laundering Act, December 2020: Included Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) as "accountable persons," subjecting them to AML/CFT obligations.

Considerations

  • Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in Uganda.
  • Holders of cryptocurrencies do not benefit from consumer protection frameworks.
  • There are risks associated with volatility, lack of backing, and potential scams.
  • Significant hurdles exist in converting crypto to fiat through regulated channels.
  • The AML framework for VASPs appears weakly enforced.
  • The government is considering introducing legislation to regulate cryptocurrency trading.

Notes

  • High Court ruling in Silver Kayondo vs Bank of Uganda (Misc. Cause No. 109 of 2022, ruling delivered April 24, 2023) upheld the BoU's mandate but clarified that cryptocurrency itself wasn't banned, only its liquidation by licensees.
  • In June 2022, the BoU invited the Blockchain Association of Uganda (BAU) to participate in its regulatory sandbox.
  • In January 2025, the State Minister for Planning acknowledged sh2.5 trillion / ~$700m in unregulated crypto transactions and indicated the government is considering regulation.
  • The Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development stated in October 2019 that the government does not recognize any cryptocurrency as legal tender and has not licensed any organization to sell or facilitate the trade in cryptocurrencies.

Detailed Explanation

Retail cryptocurrency trading in Uganda exists within a 'Gray-Zone.' Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender by the Ugandan government, specifically the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED) and the Bank of Uganda (BoU). No entities are licensed to operate cryptocurrency exchanges. A BoU directive, issued April 29, 2022, prohibits institutions licensed under the National Payment Systems (NPS) Act, 2020, from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions, effectively blocking regulated channels for converting crypto to Ugandan Shillings (UGX). This directive impacts banks and mobile money operators. The High Court ruling in Silver Kayondo vs Bank of Uganda (Miscellaneous Cause No. 109 of 2022, ruling delivered April 24, 2023) upheld the BoU's mandate under the NPS Act, declaring cryptocurrencies 'illegal or unlawful' within the regulated payment framework. However, the court also noted that the BoU didn't ban cryptocurrency itself, only its liquidation by licensees, reinforcing its gray area status. Uganda's Financial Intelligence Authority (FIA) amended the Anti-Money Laundering Act in December 2020 to include Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) as 'accountable persons,' subjecting them to AML/CFT obligations, including registration, KYC, and reporting suspicious transactions. However, the FIA has expressed concerns about widespread non-compliance. Government officials have issued warnings about the risks of cryptocurrencies, emphasizing the lack of consumer protection. Despite restrictions, the BoU invited the Blockchain Association of Uganda (BAU) to participate in its regulatory sandbox in June 2022. In January 2025, the State Minister for Planning acknowledged significant unregulated crypto transactions (sh2.5 trillion / ~$700m) and indicated the government is considering regulation. Individuals can acquire and hold cryptocurrencies, often through P2P or international platforms, but face risks and hurdles converting crypto to fiat through regulated domestic channels. The AML framework for VASPs has weak enforcement, and future regulation is possible, but the current environment remains ambiguous.

Summary Points

Here's a bullet-point summary of the Retail Cryptocurrency Trading Status in Uganda, based on the provided report:

Retail Cryptocurrency Trading Status in Uganda: April 13, 2025

I. Overall Regulatory Status: Gray Zone

  • Retail cryptocurrency trading is neither explicitly legal nor illegal.
  • Significant restrictions, warnings, and lack of legal recognition create ambiguity.
  • Individuals can acquire and hold cryptocurrencies, but at their own risk.

II. Key Regulatory Bodies and Their Roles

  • Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED):
    • States cryptocurrencies are not legal tender.
    • Has not licensed any cryptocurrency exchanges.
  • Bank of Uganda (BoU):
    • Does not recognize cryptocurrencies as legal tender.
    • Prohibits licensed institutions (banks, mobile money operators) from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions (converting crypto to UGX and vice versa).
    • Invited Blockchain Association of Uganda (BAU) to participate in its regulatory sandbox.
  • Financial Intelligence Authority (FIA):
    • Designates Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) as "accountable persons" under the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
    • Requires VASPs to register, conduct KYC, and report suspicious transactions.
    • Expresses concern about widespread non-compliance by VASPs.

III. Important Legislation and Regulations

  • National Payment Systems (NPS) Act, 2020:
    • Used by BoU to issue directives prohibiting licensed institutions from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions.
  • Anti-Money Laundering Act (Amended December 2020):
    • Includes VASPs as "accountable persons," subjecting them to AML/CFT obligations.

IV. Requirements for Compliance (for VASPs)

  • Registration with the FIA.
  • Customer Due Diligence (KYC).
  • Reporting of suspicious transactions.

V. Notable Restrictions and Limitations

  • No Legal Tender Status: Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in Uganda.
  • Banking Restrictions: Licensed financial institutions are prohibited from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions.
  • Limited Consumer Protection: Holders of cryptocurrencies do not benefit from consumer protection frameworks.
  • Weak Enforcement: AML/CFT regulations for VASPs are weakly enforced.

VI. Recent Developments and Changes

  • BoU Directive (April 29, 2022): Prohibits licensed institutions from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions.
  • High Court Ruling (April 24, 2023): Upheld BoU's mandate to issue directives under the NPS Act, stating cryptocurrencies are "illegal or unlawful" under that Act, but did not ban cryptocurrency itself.
  • BoU Regulatory Sandbox (June 2022): Invitation to Blockchain Association of Uganda (BAU) to participate.
  • Government Consideration of Regulation (January 2025): State Minister for Planning indicated the government is considering introducing legislation to regulate the sector.

Full Analysis Report

Report: Retail Cryptocurrency Trading Status in Uganda

Date: April 13, 2025

Prepared By: Specialized Financial Regulatory Analyst


Topic: Retail_Trading_Status

Description: Assessment of the legal permissibility for individual citizens and residents in Uganda to buy, sell, and hold cryptocurrencies, including the regulatory environment surrounding this activity (e.g., KYC/AML requirements imposed on platforms, general warnings issued).


1. Identified Status:

Gray-Zone

2. Detailed Narrative Explanation:

The status of retail cryptocurrency trading in Uganda is best described as a Gray-Zone. While not explicitly banned for individuals in terms of simple possession or peer-to-peer trading, significant regulatory restrictions, official warnings, and lack of legal recognition create a complex and ambiguous environment that prevents it from being classified as either clearly allowed (regulated or unregulated) or outright banned.

  • Legal Tender and Licensing: The Ugandan government, through the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED) and the Bank of Uganda (BoU), has consistently stated that cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in the country. Furthermore, no organization has been licensed by the BoU or any other government agency to operate as a cryptocurrency exchange or to facilitate the buying, selling, or trading of cryptocurrencies. This lack of licensing means any platform operating within Uganda does so without formal regulatory approval or oversight concerning crypto-specific activities.

  • Bank of Uganda Directives: A crucial element defining the gray zone is the BoU's directive, particularly highlighted in a circular dated April 29, 2022. This directive explicitly prohibits institutions licensed under the National Payment Systems (NPS) Act, 2020 (such as banks and mobile money operators) from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions. This includes converting cryptocurrencies to Ugandan Shillings (UGX) via mobile money or other licensed payment systems, and vice versa. This effectively cuts off the primary regulated channels for converting crypto assets into local fiat currency, pushing such activities towards unregulated or informal P2P markets.

  • Court Ruling: A High Court ruling in Silver Kayondo vs Bank of Uganda (Miscellaneous Cause No. 109 of 2022, ruling delivered April 24, 2023) upheld the BoU's mandate to issue such directives to its licensees under the NPS Act. The court declared that cryptocurrencies are "illegal or unlawful" under the current National Payment System Act and are not accepted as a general payment instrument within that regulated framework. Importantly, the ruling also noted that the BoU "did not ban cryptocurrency but rather directed licensees under the National Payment System Act to desist from liquidating cryptocurrency." This distinction confirms that while official facilitation is blocked, the act of holding or trading itself wasn't deemed universally illegal by this ruling, reinforcing the gray zone status.

  • AML/CFT Regulations: Uganda's Financial Intelligence Authority (FIA) has taken steps to address money laundering and terrorism financing risks associated with crypto assets. In December 2020, the Anti-Money Laundering Act was amended to include Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) as "accountable persons." This subjects them to AML/CFT obligations, including registration with the FIA, customer due diligence (KYC), and reporting suspicious transactions. However, the FIA has publicly expressed concerns about widespread non-compliance by VASPs with these registration and reporting requirements, indicating weak enforcement or oversight in practice. The FIA has called for more comprehensive crypto regulations to address these gaps.

  • Government Warnings and Consumer Protection: Officials have repeatedly warned the public about the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, citing their volatility, lack of backing by assets or government guarantees, and the potential for scams. They emphasize that holders of cryptocurrencies in Uganda do not benefit from any consumer protection frameworks should they incur losses or if platforms fail.

  • Regulatory Sandbox and Future Considerations: Despite the restrictive stance, in June 2022, the BoU invited the Blockchain Association of Uganda (BAU) to participate in its regulatory sandbox, suggesting a willingness to explore the technology and potential use cases under controlled conditions. More recently, in January 2025, the State Minister for Planning acknowledged the significant volume of unregulated crypto transactions originating from Uganda (citing sh2.5 trillion / ~$700m) and indicated that the government is considering introducing legislation to regulate the sector. This signals a potential shift from the current gray zone towards a more defined regulatory framework in the future, but as of now, that framework is not in place.

In summary, individuals in Uganda can technically acquire and hold cryptocurrencies, often through P2P methods or international platforms, but they do so at their own risk, without consumer protection, and face significant hurdles in converting crypto to fiat through regulated domestic channels due to BoU directives. The existing AML framework for VASPs appears weakly enforced, and while future regulation is being considered, the current environment remains ambiguous and restrictive without being a complete prohibition.

3. Relevant Text Excerpts:

  • On Legal Tender and Licensing:
    > "This is to inform the general public that:- a. The government of Uganda does not recognize any crypto-currency as legal tender in Uganda. b. The government of Uganda has not licensed any organization in Uganda to sell crypto-currencies or to facilitate the trade in crypto-currencies and so these organizations are not regulated by the Government or any of its agencies."
    > Source: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Public Statement on Crypto-Currencies (October 2019)

  • On BoU Directive to Payment Providers:
    > “This is to advise that Bank of Uganda has not licensed any institution to sell cryptocurrencies or to facilitate the trade in crypto-currencies... Bank of Uganda shall not hesitate to invoke its powers under Section 13(l) (b) & (f) of the NPS Act, 2020 for any licensees that will be found in contravention of the foregoing directive.” [Directive aimed at stopping conversion to/from mobile money]
    > Source: Bank of Uganda Circular (NPSD 306/10), April 29, 2022 (Summarized from Daily Monitor and Remitano reports)

  • On Court Ruling:
    > "Hon. Justice Ssekaana Musa, in dismissing the application, ruled to the effect that cryptocurrencies, under the current National Payment System Act, are illegal or unlawful and are not accepted as a general payment instrument; and that the Bank of Uganda had the mandate to issue directives to the licensees under the National Payment System... The respondent [BoU] did not ban cryptocurrency but rather directed licensees under the National Payment System Act to desist from liquidating cryptocurrency..."
    > Source: CIPESA, CRYPTOCURRENCY AND REGULATION IN UGANDA REPORT (Summarizing High Court ruling in Silver Kayondo vs Bank of Uganda, Misc. Cause No. 109 of 2022)

  • On AML/CFT and VASP Compliance:
    > "In December 2020, the Financial Intelligence Authority (FIA) published a letter amending the Anti-Money Laundering Act to include virtual asset service providers (VASPs) among the list of “accountable persons” subject to supervision and monitoring by the FIA... Executive Director of the FIA, Sydney Asubo, however, has expressed her concerns with the substantial noncompliance of market participants to the agency's licensing requirements... In a recent report by the FIA, it was announced that “only a few [VASPs had] registered.”"
    > Source: Freeman Law, Uganda and Cryptocurrency

  • On Lack of Consumer Protection:
    > "As such, unlike other owners of financial assets who are protected by Government regulation, holders of crypto-currencies in Uganda do not enjoy any consumer protection should they lose the value assigned to their holdings of crypto-currencies, or should organization facilitating the use, holding or trading of crypto-currencies fail..."
    > Source: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Public Statement on Crypto-Currencies (October 2019)

  • On Considering Future Regulation:
    > “Using bitcoin, a lot of transactions are happening and these transactions are not being managed anywhere because they are not regulated... over $700m (equivalent to sh2.5 trillion) in transactions were reported from Uganda alone... Bank of Uganda is not responsible for them, nobody is responsible for them... [Government is considering] introducing legislation to regulate the booming cryptocurrency trade..."
    > Source: State Minister for Planning, Amos Lugoloobi, January 6, 2025 (Reported by New Vision)

4. Source URLs:


End of Report

Web Sources (12)

Sources discovered via web search grounding

Search queries used (5)
  • What is the legal status of cryptocurrency trading for individuals in Uganda?
  • Are crypto exchanges licensed or regulated in Uganda?
  • Bank of Uganda cryptocurrency statement
  • Uganda crypto regulation 2024 OR 2025
  • Uganda Financial Intelligence Authority crypto guidelines

Reviews

No reviews yet

Submit Review

Challenge: Disagree with the analysis | Approval: Confirm it's correct | Refinement: Suggest improvements